Docker-Generated Catalyst Screening

Upgrading Severity Lab

A 3D hydrotreating and catalyst workbench for testing whether sewage-sludge biocrude can move from unstable oil to usable hydrocarbon fuel blendstock.

10

marker molecules checked

7

catalyst routes scored

4

upgrading scenarios

127.4

max g H2/kg marker

Interactive Upgrading Twin

Catalyst route severity and hydrogen-demand lab

Scenario score63.4
H2 severity70
Avg HDN71
Fuel reach68

High-value validation. Use this branch only when hydrogen demand, HDN, HDS, HDO, yield loss, and ASTM-style properties close together.

Deep hydrotreating

Two-stage NiMo deep HDN

Strongest route to diesel-range heteroatom removal, but hydrogen consumption and catalyst life become central costs.

HDN kinetics, hydrogen uptake, catalyst deactivation, liquid yield loss, carbon efficiency, and fuel property closure.
Polishing

CoMo diesel polishing bed

Useful as a sulfur/aromatic polishing comparison, but nitrogen inhibition can limit standalone sludge-biocrude duty.

Nitrogen inhibition, sulfur removal, aromatic saturation, cetane, density, and guard-bed needs.

Marker molecules include phenol, acetic acid, palmitic acid, oleic acid, pyridine, indole, carbazole, quinoline, dibenzothiophene, and naphthalene. Nitrogen heterocycles carry the highest per-marker hydrogen demand in the generated screen.

Current upgrading decision

Stabilize first, then prove deep denitrogenation before diesel claims

The generated screen keeps mild NiMo stabilization as the near-term handling gate, but ranks continuous slurry hydrotreating and two-stage NiMo deep HDN as the routes that deserve serious scale-up comparison. Nitrogen heterocycles such as pyridine, indole, quinoline, and carbazole remain the hard molecular reason this is not ready as finished fuel.

Operability

Continuous slurry hydrotreating

71.3

Pilot comparison suggests slurry operation can remove heteroatoms and crack heavy fractions, with operability still open.

Catalyst
Dispersed/slurry hydrotreating catalyst
Severity
350 C, 100 bar, H2 severity 66
Must prove
Long-run solids handling, catalyst recovery, fouling, pressure letdown, recycle strategy, and offgas/liquid balance.
Deep hydrotreating

Two-stage NiMo deep HDN

68.2

Strongest route to diesel-range heteroatom removal, but hydrogen consumption and catalyst life become central costs.

Catalyst
Sulfided NiMo/Al2O3 in stabilization plus severe bed
Severity
400 C, 100 bar, H2 severity 78
Must prove
HDN kinetics, hydrogen uptake, catalyst deactivation, liquid yield loss, carbon efficiency, and fuel property closure.
Polishing

CoMo diesel polishing bed

58.6

Useful as a sulfur/aromatic polishing comparison, but nitrogen inhibition can limit standalone sludge-biocrude duty.

Catalyst
Sulfided CoMo/Al2O3
Severity
380 C, 90 bar, H2 severity 62
Must prove
Nitrogen inhibition, sulfur removal, aromatic saturation, cetane, density, and guard-bed needs.
Stabilization

Mild NiMo stabilization

53.3

Best near-term stabilization step; it improves storage/handling but should not be sold as finished diesel proof.

Catalyst
Sulfided NiMo/Al2O3
Severity
240 C, 100 bar, H2 severity 35
Must prove
Viscosity, TAN, oxygen, nitrogen, sulfur, pressure drop, coke, and catalyst activity after long runs.
Co-feed upgrading

Pd/C co-feed hydrotreating

50.1

A high-hydrogenation benchmark for cleaner co-feed biocrudes, but precious-metal poisoning risk is material.

Catalyst
Pd/C
Severity
340 C, 80 bar, H2 severity 58
Must prove
Sulfur/nitrogen tolerance, metals poisoning, regeneration, hydrogen efficiency, and cost versus NiMo/CoMo.
Catalytic cracking

Dual-base ZSM-5 cracking/upgrading

48

Newest high-upside sludge-biocrude lead for cracking heavy oil and boosting hydrocarbons, with lifetime risk unresolved.

Catalyst
NaOH + TPAOH modified ZSM-5
Severity
380 C, 35 bar, H2 severity 48
Must prove
Coking, acid-site loss, nitrogen poisoning, metals tolerance, regeneration, and independent replication.
Pretreatment

Demetallization plus guard bed

36

Not a fuel-making step, but it may protect expensive hydrotreating catalyst from metals/ash exposure.

Catalyst
Acid wash / sorbent guard before hydrotreater
Severity
80 C, 1 bar, H2 severity 8
Must prove
Organic loss, acid consumption, wastewater burden, metals removal, and downstream catalyst-life improvement.

Molecular severity markers

Which molecules drive hydrogen, catalyst, and fuel-spec risk

hydrodeoxygenation

Phenol

C6H6O

Phenolics track oxygen removal and catalyst acid/hydrogenation balance.

85.7 g H2/kg marker
hydrodeoxygenation

Acetic acid

C2H4O2

Light acids flag acidity, corrosion, and aqueous loss before hydrotreating.

100.7 g H2/kg marker
hydrodeoxygenation

Palmitic acid

C16H32O2

Fatty acids are easier diesel-range precursors but still consume hydrogen.

23.6 g H2/kg marker
saturation + hydrodeoxygenation

Oleic acid

C18H34O2

Unsaturation adds stabilization demand before finished fuel claims.

28.5 g H2/kg marker
hydrodenitrogenation

Pyridine

C5H5N

Basic nitrogenates inhibit hydrotreating and drive severe HDN needs.

127.4 g H2/kg marker
hydrodenitrogenation

Indole

C8H7N

Indoles represent persistent nitrogen species in upgraded HTL oils.

120.5 g H2/kg marker
deep hydrodenitrogenation

Carbazole

C12H9N

Carbazole is a hard marker for deep denitrogenation and hydrogen demand.

120.6 g H2/kg marker
deep hydrodenitrogenation

Quinoline

C9H7N

Quinoline-like bases can poison acidic and sulfided catalyst functions.

124.9 g H2/kg marker
hydrodesulfurization

Dibenzothiophene

C12H8S

Dibenzothiophene is a sulfur-removal marker for fuel specification risk.

43.8 g H2/kg marker
hydrodearomatization

Naphthalene

C10H8

Aromatic saturation affects cetane, density, smoke point, and hydrogen consumption.

78.6 g H2/kg marker
upgrading-mild-hydrotreating-2026

Mild hydrotreatment as stabilization for nitrogen-rich sewage sludge biocrude

Pilot-scale trickle-bed NiMo stabilization study with long operating time and temperature guidance.

Open source
upgrading-dual-base-zsm5-2026

Dual-base modified ZSM-5 upgrading of municipal sludge hydrothermal biocrude

2026 catalyst lead reporting improved deoxygenation, hydrocarbon content, and heavy-fraction cracking.

Open source
upgrading-food-waste-catalysts-2026

Pd/C, NiMo, and CoMo hydrotreating comparison for wet-waste HTL biocrude

Catalyst comparison useful for co-feed and catalyst benchmark design.

Open source
upgrading-water-research-2026

Hydrothermal liquefaction of municipal sludge: production and fuel-quality upgrading

2026 review emphasizing catalyst innovation, fuel quality, byproducts, and pilot integration.

Open source
upgrading-kinetic-model-2024

Hydrotreatment of sewage sludge-derived HTL biocrude kinetic model

Kinetic model using 15 experiments, distributed lumps, and 100 bar hydrogen treatment.

Open source
upgrading-slurry-pilot-2024

Continuous slurry hydrotreating of sewage-sludge HTL biocrude

Pilot comparison of slurry and fixed-bed operation for sewage-sludge HTL oil upgrading.

Open source
upgrading-two-stage-hydrotreating-2020

Two-stage hydrotreatment of highly nitrogenous biocrude

Two-stage stabilization/deep treatment frame with strong denitrogenation but high hydrogen consumption.

Open source
upgrading-advanced-characterization-2022

Advanced characterization of upgraded sewage-sludge HTL biocrude

FTICR-MS/GC-MS evidence for nitrogen and aromatic species that drive upgrading severity.

Open source
upgrading-demetallization-2022

Demetallization of nitrogen-rich HTL biocrudes

Demetallization lead for protecting hydrotreating catalyst from metals/ash exposure.

Open source
upgrading-drop-in-report-2024

IEA Bioenergy Task 39 drop-in biofuels and co-processing update

Frames drop-in fuel and co-processing challenges for biocrude upgrading.

Open source
upgrading-rsc-wet-waste-2026

Wet-waste HTL TEA/LCA with marine fuel, renewable diesel, and SAF strategies

Product-slate TEA/LCA context for different upgrading severities.

Open source