Docker-Generated WRRF Integration

WRRF Integration Lab

A 3D experiment workspace for testing whether sewage-sludge HTL biocrude production can be connected to anaerobic digestion, nitrification, PFAS control, hydrochar handling, and hydrotreating without breaking the wastewater plant.

17

RDKit-checked aqueous, biogas, product, corrosion, nutrient, and PFAS marker molecules

10

WRRF integration routes ranked across biology, PFAS, energy, product release, and residual closure

PFAS source-control and fluorine closure

top current integration route because plant compatibility cannot be inferred from biocrude yield

6

selected phase, AD, nitrification, PFAS, hydrochar, and hydrotreating routes for the next experiment package

Interactive WRRF Integration

Test whether the oil route can live inside a working wastewater plant

Route score95.7
Energy recovery34
Biology fit58
PFAS control100
contaminant control

PFAS source-control and fluorine closure

Keep industrial source control, EPA 1633, total fluorine, and residual routing upstream of any reuse decision.

industrial source review, EPA 1633, TOP/suspect screen, total fluorine, product/water/char/gas fate, and hold rule.

Product
88
Residuals
88
Verification
98
Readiness
56

Pyomo-formulated WRRF integration selector with deterministic enumeration across phase closure, AD, nitrification, PFAS, product, and residual constraints. Current package covers 6 route categories and 16 molecular markers.

Molecules tied to this route

PFOA; PFOS; Water

The selected route is not a single reactor claim. It has to pass molecule-level water, product, offgas, residual, and plant-biology checks before it becomes a pilot operating plan.

Top marker
PFOS
Experiments
PFAS and total fluorine closure

The next experiments are not optional optimization work: BMP/co-digestion, nitrification inhibition, PFAS fluorine closure, hydrochar leach tests, and hydrotreating assays decide whether the plan can be created at a real WRRF.

Integration success means the wastewater plant still treats water reliably while the fuel line proves oil quality, hydrogen demand, residual routing, and contaminant fate.

PFOS, PFOA, pyridine, ammonia, phenol, chloride, hydrogen sulfide, and phosphorus markers keep the project from hiding risk in side-streams while focusing only on biocrude yield.

Current integration decision

The oil route has to prove it can coexist with the wastewater plant

HTL can make an oil-like biocrude from wet sludge, but creation at a real site depends on the support system: HTL aqueous phase must not inhibit digestion or nitrification, hydrochar must pass residual and phosphorus checks, PFAS must close across all streams, and upgraded oil must pass hydrotreating release assays. This page makes those dependencies visible as an experiment package.

Portfolio score598.4

6 integration categories are covered by the selected Docker-generated route package.

Top route score95.7

PFAS source-control and fluorine closure leads because contaminant closure drives release risk.

Nitrification risk92

Pyridine, ammonia, pyrazine, phenols, and polar nitrogen markers keep the return-load gate strict.

PFAS signal100

PFAS source control remains part of integration, not a downstream paperwork item.

Selected integration package

Six routes that must pass before a WRRF pilot should be framed as creation-ready

contaminant control

PFAS source-control and fluorine closure

Score 95.7; energy 34; biology 58; PFAS 100; readiness 56. Proof required: industrial source review, EPA 1633, TOP/suspect screen, total fluorine, product/water/char/gas fate, and hold rule.

mass closure

Feed-to-product phase closure front end

Score 92.6; energy 70; biology 62; PFAS 70; readiness 82. Proof required: weekly feed characterization, oil/aqueous/char/gas mass closure, CHNSO, COD, and ash-normalized yield.

residual integration

Hydrochar phosphorus and metals recovery

Score 89.5; energy 48; biology 66; PFAS 82; readiness 64. Proof required: hydrochar mass, P speciation, ICP metals, TCLP/leaching, total fluorine, fertilizer boundary, and disposal backup.

product integration

Hydrotreating and offsite product interface

Score 87.3; energy 62; biology 46; PFAS 66; readiness 58. Proof required: oil CHNSO, H2 uptake, HDN/HDO/HDS, chloride, catalyst exposure, SimDist, acid number, sulfur, nitrogen, and stability.

biological compatibility

Nitrification protection sidestream gate

Score 84.6; energy 45; biology 96; PFAS 54; readiness 68. Proof required: respirometry, nitrification inhibition, sOUR, ammonia oxidation rate, DOC/UVT, pH, salinity, and acclimation checks.

anaerobic integration

HTL aqueous phase to mesophilic AD

Score 83.9; energy 92; biology 66; PFAS 42; readiness 74. Proof required: BMP, continuous co-digestion ramp, TAN, VFA, phenolics, methane yield, digestate PFAS/metals, and foaming checks.

Integration route ledger

Every WRRF route is scored against plant biology, product release, PFAS, and residual closure

contaminant control

PFAS source-control and fluorine closure

Score
95.7
Energy
34
Biology
58
PFAS
100
mass closure

Feed-to-product phase closure front end

Score
92.6
Energy
70
Biology
62
PFAS
70
residual integration

Hydrochar phosphorus and metals recovery

Score
89.5
Energy
48
Biology
66
PFAS
82
product integration

Hydrotreating and offsite product interface

Score
87.3
Energy
62
Biology
46
PFAS
66
biological compatibility

Nitrification protection sidestream gate

Score
84.6
Energy
45
Biology
96
PFAS
54
anaerobic integration

HTL aqueous phase to mesophilic AD

Score
83.9
Energy
92
Biology
66
PFAS
42
aqueous valorization

Electrochemical aqueous support for H2 and COD

Score
82.4
Energy
82
Biology
72
PFAS
50
aqueous pretreatment

Ozone pretreatment plus biological polishing

Score
81.4
Energy
58
Biology
88
PFAS
48
aqueous pretreatment

Wet oxidation heat-integration branch

Score
78.8
Energy
78
Biology
74
PFAS
44
anaerobic integration

Dynamic membrane anaerobic biofilm reactor

Score
78.5
Energy
86
Biology
78
PFAS
44

Category ledger

The best package is a linked plant test, not a single route winner

contaminant control
Routes
1
Score
95.7
Biology
58
PFAS
100
mass closure
Routes
1
Score
92.6
Biology
62
PFAS
70
residual integration
Routes
1
Score
89.5
Biology
66
PFAS
82
product integration
Routes
1
Score
87.3
Biology
46
PFAS
66
biological compatibility
Routes
1
Score
84.6
Biology
96
PFAS
54
aqueous valorization
Routes
1
Score
82.4
Biology
72
PFAS
50
anaerobic integration
Routes
2
Score
81.2
Biology
72
PFAS
43
aqueous pretreatment
Routes
2
Score
80.1
Biology
81
PFAS
46

Selected experiment package

The next proof package tests biology, contaminants, residuals, and product release together

contaminant control

PFAS and total fluorine closure

EPA 1633, TOP/suspect screening, total fluorine, and oil/water/char/gas/residual partitioning

Keeps PFAS source control and residual routing visible before product or hydrochar claims.

mass closure

Feed and phase closure campaign

30-day feed composite plus HTL oil, aqueous, hydrochar, gas, solvent, ash, COD, CHNSO, and metals balance

Stops any plant-integration claim when the reactor mass balance is open.

product integration

Hydrotreating product-interface release assay

oil CHNSO, nitrogen speciation, chloride/sulfur, H2 uptake, catalyst exposure, SimDist, acid number, and stability

Separates WRRF integration success from finished-fuel readiness.

biological compatibility

Nitrification inhibition and acclimation test

respirometry, specific ammonia oxidation rate, sOUR, ammonia/nitrite/nitrate, pH, salinity, DOC, and UVT across dilution series

Defines whether HTL water can return to mainstream treatment or needs side-stream treatment.

residual integration

Hydrochar P/metals/PFAS leaching

P speciation, ICP metals, pH-dependent leaching, TCLP-style screen, total fluorine, and beneficial-use boundary review

Determines whether hydrochar is a recovery stream, disposal stream, or source-control problem.

anaerobic integration

HTL aqueous BMP and digester ramp

BMP vials followed by continuous mesophilic co-digestion at rising HTL aqueous fractions

Measures methane upside, inhibition, TAN/VFA stress, and digestate quality.

Molecular marker ledger

Molecules that tell whether the plant is recovering energy or just moving burden

PFAS sentinel

PFOS C8HF17O3S

Priority
82.6
AD
0
Nitr.
38
PFAS
100
PFAS sentinel

PFOA C8HF15O2

Priority
81
AD
0
Nitr.
36
PFAS
100
N-heterocycle

Pyridine C5H5N

Priority
66
AD
20
Nitr.
92
PFAS
0
N-heterocycle

Pyrazine C4H4N2

Priority
63.6
AD
18
Nitr.
86
PFAS
0
return-load nitrogen

Ammonia H3N

Priority
60.3
AD
42
Nitr.
90
PFAS
0
salt and corrosion

Sodium chloride ClNa

Priority
54.6
AD
16
Nitr.
54
PFAS
0
aqueous nitrogen

2-Pyrrolidinone C4H7NO

Priority
54
AD
26
Nitr.
74
PFAS
0
phenolic inhibitor

p-Cresol C7H8O

Priority
53.4
AD
28
Nitr.
84
PFAS
0
bio-inhibition marker

Phenol C6H6O

Priority
52.8
AD
32
Nitr.
78
PFAS
0
offgas corrosion

Hydrogen sulfide H2S

Priority
50.4
AD
54
Nitr.
20
PFAS
0
process medium

Water H2O

Priority
48.8
AD
50
Nitr.
42
PFAS
24
upgrading reagent

Hydrogen H2

Priority
48
AD
28
Nitr.
0
PFAS
0
energy recovery

Methane CH4

Priority
40.5
AD
96
Nitr.
0
PFAS
0
aqueous VFA

Acetic acid C2H4O2

Priority
38.5
AD
82
Nitr.
24
PFAS
0
aqueous VFA

Propionic acid C3H6O2

Priority
37.9
AD
78
Nitr.
28
PFAS
0
carbon ledger

Carbon dioxide CO2

Priority
34.1
AD
62
Nitr.
0
PFAS
0
hydrochar nutrient

Phosphoric acid H3O4P

Priority
32.9
AD
8
Nitr.
16
PFAS
0

Highest marker priorities

PFAS and N-heterocycles sit beside methane and hydrogen because integration has two jobs

contaminant fate

PFOS

persistent sulfonate PFAS marker for source-control and residual routing. Release priority 100; nitrification risk 38; product signal 84; source IDs integration-wrf-pfas-2025; integration-biosolids-pfas-2025.

contaminant fate

PFOA

source-control and feed-water-char-product fluorine-closure marker. Release priority 100; nitrification risk 36; product signal 82; source IDs integration-wrf-pfas-2025; integration-biosolids-pfas-2025.

aqueous and oil

Pyridine

nitrification-inhibition and oil-nitrogen marker. Release priority 92; nitrification risk 92; product signal 70; source IDs integration-frontiers-aq-2026; integration-nitrogen-sequential-2022.

aqueous and oil

Pyrazine

water-soluble nitrogen heterocycle tied to treatment and product-quality gates. Release priority 88; nitrification risk 86; product signal 64; source IDs integration-frontiers-aq-2026; integration-sfc-hrms-2025.

HTL aqueous

Ammonia

aqueous TAN and digester/side-stream nitrogen marker. Release priority 90; nitrification risk 90; product signal 20; source IDs integration-part-iii-aqueous-2023; integration-pnnl-monetization-2024.

aqueous and oil

Sodium chloride

salinity, corrosion, extraction bias, and hydrotreating-equipment risk marker. Release priority 86; nitrification risk 54; product signal 76; source IDs integration-rti-hydrotreating-2022; integration-aqueous-recycle-2022.

HTL aqueous

2-Pyrrolidinone

polar nitrogen marker for diluted return-load and biological compatibility testing. Release priority 80; nitrification risk 74; product signal 38; source IDs integration-frontiers-aq-2026; integration-pnnl-aqueous-2017.

HTL aqueous

p-Cresol

protein-derived phenolic stress marker for biological compatibility. Release priority 84; nitrification risk 84; product signal 18; source IDs integration-frontiers-aq-2026; integration-ozone-bio-2025.

Full experiment ledger

Unselected routes still define follow-on experiments after the first WRRF package

selected

PFAS and total fluorine closure

Urgency 104.7; route score 92.6. Keeps PFAS source control and residual routing visible before product or hydrochar claims.

selected

Feed and phase closure campaign

Urgency 103.6; route score 92.6. Stops any plant-integration claim when the reactor mass balance is open.

selected

Hydrotreating product-interface release assay

Urgency 99; route score 87.3. Separates WRRF integration success from finished-fuel readiness.

selected

Nitrification inhibition and acclimation test

Urgency 98.2; route score 83. Defines whether HTL water can return to mainstream treatment or needs side-stream treatment.

selected

Hydrochar P/metals/PFAS leaching

Urgency 97.8; route score 89.5. Determines whether hydrochar is a recovery stream, disposal stream, or source-control problem.

selected

HTL aqueous BMP and digester ramp

Urgency 95.1; route score 81.2. Measures methane upside, inhibition, TAN/VFA stress, and digestate quality.

aqueous pretreatment

Ozone plus biological polishing dose response

Urgency 83.9; route score 81.4. Tests whether pretreatment reduces phenolics/N-heterocycles without an energy or byproduct penalty.

aqueous valorization

Electrochemical COD-to-H2 support run

Urgency 83.3; route score 82.4. Shows whether aqueous COD can support hydrotreating hydrogen rather than only adding treatment load.

integration-part-i-distribution-2022

Incorporating HTL into wastewater treatment, Part I: process optimization and product distribution

Product and element distribution source for carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, oil, aqueous, hydrochar, gas, and energy recovery boundaries.

Open source
integration-part-iii-aqueous-2023

Incorporating HTL into wastewater treatment, Part III: aqueous phase characterization and on-site treatment

Aqueous-phase source framing WRRF treatment integration as a major HTL bottleneck.

Open source
integration-pnnl-aqueous-2017

Quantitative characterization of HTL aqueous byproducts from municipal wastes

PNNL source for organic acids, nitrogen compounds, oxygenates, inorganic species, and carbon losses in HTL water.

Open source
integration-pnnl-monetization-2024

Aqueous-phase treatment and monetization options for wet-waste HTL

PNNL TEA/LCA source for COD, nitrogen, fuel-gas, fertilizer, and aqueous monetization options.

Open source
integration-frontiers-aq-2026

HTL aqueous phase effects on activated sludge, nitrification, and UV disinfection

Activated-sludge compatibility source showing expected diluted loading can be manageable but nitrification and UV disinfection need site-specific checks.

Open source
integration-ad-energy-2026

HTL of sewage sludge for biocrude production and synergistic byproduct utilization in AD

Source for routing HTL aqueous phase and hydrochar into AD/resource-recovery integration rather than treating byproducts as waste only.

Open source
integration-ozone-bio-2025

Ozone pretreatment plus biological treatment of HTL aqueous phase

Source for ozone/biological treatment of HTL aqueous phase to reduce recalcitrant and inhibitory organic burden.

Open source
integration-aerobic-cotreatment-2025

Co-treatment of HTL aqueous phase in aerobic wastewater treatment systems

Source for aerobic co-treatment and biological compatibility constraints for diluted HTL aqueous phase.

Open source
integration-eco-pnnl-2025

Electrocatalytic oxidation of HTL aqueous phase for hydrogen and COD management

PNNL source for using electrochemical treatment to reduce aqueous COD while producing useful hydrogen/support energy.

Open source
integration-htl-wo-2025

Integrated HTL and wet oxidation for energy recovery from wastewater solids

Wet-oxidation integration source for heat/COD recovery branches when biological treatment is not enough.

Open source
integration-wao-pnnl-2025

Wet air oxidation of HTL aqueous phase for treatment and heat integration

PNNL source for continuous wet-air-oxidation treatment of wet-waste HTL aqueous phase.

Open source
integration-hydrochar-jclepro-2023

Hydrochar characterization and applications from sludge HTL

Hydrochar source for phosphorus concentration, leachability, and residual-use boundaries.

Open source
integration-p-recovery-2025

Phosphorus recovery from sludge hydrochar and HTL residues

Phosphorus-recovery source for treating hydrochar as a nutrient recovery branch with metals and contaminant boundaries.

Open source
integration-wrf-pfas-2025

WRF project on HTL aqueous integration and PFAS fate

WRF source for HTL aqueous integration into WRRF digestion processes and PFAS fate assessment.

Open source
integration-biosolids-pfas-2025

Municipal biosolids PFAS treatment literature review

PFAS source for source-control, treatment, residual, and product-release caution around biosolids.

Open source
integration-rti-hydrotreating-2022

Hydrotreatment of solvent-extracted municipal sewage-sludge biocrude

Hydrotreating source documenting chloride, catalyst, corrosion, yield, and product-quality issues for sludge biocrude.

Open source
integration-rsc-wet-waste-2026

Wet-waste HTL product slate TEA/LCA across marine fuel, diesel, and SAF

TEA/LCA source for keeping product slate, hydrogen demand, CI, and policy boundaries explicit.

Open source
integration-energy-htl-2026

Municipal sludge HTL energy recovery and process integration

Recent energy source for municipal-sludge HTL process integration and energy recovery constraints.

Open source
integration-acs-iecr-2024

Characterization of biocrude from HTL of municipal sewage sludge in a 500 mL reactor

Open ACS source for batch sewage-sludge HTL phase yields, water-soluble products, and inorganic partitioning.

Open source
integration-sfc-hrms-2025

SFC-HRMS characterization of sewage-sludge biocrude nitrogen and oxygen compounds

Molecular-forensics source for N-heterocycles and polar compounds that matter to both product and water integration.

Open source
integration-nitrogen-sequential-2022

Sequential extraction and characterization of nitrogen compounds after sewage-sludge HTL

Open nitrogen-forensics source for pyridinic/aromatic nitrogen compounds in sludge biocrude fractions.

Open source
integration-biogas-reforming-2026

Wastewater biogas reforming and hydrogen integration

Hydrogen-integration source for using WRRF biogas and methane systems in the fuel-upgrading boundary.

Open source
integration-materials-performance-2025

Materials and corrosion performance for wet-waste HTL and upgrading

Materials source for treating salts, H2S, chloride, and oxygenated water as pressure-boundary and hydrotreating risks.

Open source
integration-aqueous-recycle-2022

Aqueous phase recycling in sewage-sludge HTL

Aqueous recycle source for yield uplift, heavy-metal enrichment, and pollution redistribution risks.

Open source

the sewage-to-fuel plan is not integration-ready until HTL aqueous phase, nitrification, anaerobic digestion, PFAS fate, hydrochar handling, and hydrotreating release are tested on the same site basis. Modeling basis: one municipal WRRF receiving 1000 kg dry sludge equivalent per HTL integration case. Selected package: PFAS source-control and fluorine closure; Feed-to-product phase closure front end; Hydrochar phosphorus and metals recovery; Hydrotreating and offsite product interface; Nitrification protection sidestream gate; HTL aqueous phase to mesophilic AD.