Docker-Generated Co-Feed Screen

Co-Feed Blend Lab

A 3D blend lab for comparing food waste, FOG, beverage residues, digestate, algae, manure, glycerol, green waste, and plastic watch items as sewage-sludge HTL co-feeds.

12

co-feed candidates scored

FOG / grease-trap waste

top individual co-feed

Food waste + FOG + beverage waste

top blend scenario

3

plastic watch items kept out of the first blend

Interactive Co-Feed Twin

Blend strategy and contaminant-boundary lab

Scenario score65.6
Co-feed blend42%
Oil yield est.26.9%
Risk / oxygen30.7/38.7

Best first co-feed campaign. Combines wet-organic availability, lipid H/C lift, and low-ash beverage residues without relying on plastic carbon.

Wet organic co-feed

Source-separated food waste glucose

Recent sludge plus food-waste co-HTL work makes mixing ratio and severity a direct lever for biocrude yield and aqueous-phase nitrogen.

Seasonal composition, salt, packaging contamination, COD in the aqueous phase, wet logistics, and whether yield gains survive at pilot residence time.
Lipid-rich co-feed

FOG / grease-trap waste oleic acid

Lipid-rich wet wastes raise H/C and dilute sludge nitrogen and ash, making them strong quality improvers when emulsification and collection are controlled.

Stable feed pumping, free-water split, sewer contaminants, FOG availability, emulsification energy, and whether high-lipid blends coke during upgrading.
Carbohydrate-alcohol co-feed

Brewery / beverage waste ethanol

Sewage sludge plus brewery and winery residues has published co-HTL evidence for synergistic product yield and energy-content effects.

Local waste volume, pH swings, residual cleaning chemicals, solids handling, and whether alcohol/carbohydrate fractions change aqueous treatment load.

The Docker selection model picks FOG / grease-trap waste + Source-separated food waste + Brewery / beverage waste as the first organic co-feed blend. Pyomo-formulated three-co-feed selection with lipid, food/beverage, dry-blend, contaminant-risk, and oxygen-penalty gates; plastic feeds are visible as watch items but excluded from the first organic bench blend.

Current co-feed decision

Use wet organics and lipids first; keep plastics as boundary tests

The generated screen ranks FOG and grease-trap waste first because lipid-rich co-feeds can raise H/C, dilute nitrogen, and improve oil quality without making the plan depend on plastic carbon. The best first blend combines food waste, FOG, and beverage residues. Plastic fractions stay visible as watch items because chlorine, additives, microplastics, and carbon accounting can erase the benefit.

Best first co-feed campaign

Food waste + FOG + beverage waste

65.6

Combines wet-organic availability, lipid H/C lift, and low-ash beverage residues without relying on plastic carbon.

Blend
42% dry co-feed
Yield estimate
26.9% dry feed
N/O estimate
4.48/15.35 wt%
Risk
30.7
High-quality organic branch

Food waste + food-processing grease

61.7

Targets oil quality and nitrogen dilution if a reliable industrial lipid stream exists near the wastewater plant.

Blend
36% dry co-feed
Yield estimate
26.3% dry feed
N/O estimate
4.63/15.42 wt%
Risk
33
Hydrocarbon boost watch item

Food waste + PE/PP film

56.7

Can improve H/C, but plastic sorting, additives, chlorine exclusion, and carbon-accounting questions dominate.

Blend
24% dry co-feed
Yield estimate
25.7% dry feed
N/O estimate
4.89/15.2 wt%
Risk
50
Infrastructure-aligned municipal branch

Food waste + OFMSW digestate

53.9

Uses local organic waste infrastructure but needs grit, salts, packaging contamination, and aqueous load controls.

Blend
45% dry co-feed
Yield estimate
26.2% dry feed
N/O estimate
4.93/16.35 wt%
Risk
38
Biogenic discovery branch

Food waste + microalgae

51.5

Wet-biomass compatible, but algae cost and nitrogen transfer keep it behind waste-derived lipid routes.

Blend
35% dry co-feed
Yield estimate
25.6% dry feed
N/O estimate
5.31/15.7 wt%
Risk
29
Do-not-promote boundary case

PET + polyamide textile boundary

25.5

Useful as a contaminant sensitivity case because oxygenated and nitrogen plastics can worsen oil quality and catalyst risk.

Blend
8% dry co-feed
Yield estimate
24.2% dry feed
N/O estimate
5.46/15.97 wt%
Risk
81

Generated organic blend

Pyomo-gated co-feed selection

64.4

FOG / grease-trap waste

Stable feed pumping, free-water split, sewer contaminants, FOG availability, emulsification energy, and whether high-lipid blends coke during upgrading.

57.6

Source-separated food waste

Seasonal composition, salt, packaging contamination, COD in the aqueous phase, wet logistics, and whether yield gains survive at pilot residence time.

56.8

Brewery / beverage waste

Local waste volume, pH swings, residual cleaning chemicals, solids handling, and whether alcohol/carbohydrate fractions change aqueous treatment load.

Candidate ledger

Co-feed quality, contaminant risk, and RDKit proxy chemistry

Lipid-rich co-feed64.4

FOG / grease-trap waste oleic acid

Lipid-rich wet wastes raise H/C and dilute sludge nitrogen and ash, making them strong quality improvers when emulsification and collection are controlled.

Max blend
20%
H/C proxy
1.89
N dilution
94
Risk
36
Wet organic co-feed57.6

Source-separated food waste glucose

Recent sludge plus food-waste co-HTL work makes mixing ratio and severity a direct lever for biocrude yield and aqueous-phase nitrogen.

Max blend
40%
H/C proxy
2
N dilution
76
Risk
32
Carbohydrate-alcohol co-feed56.8

Brewery / beverage waste ethanol

Sewage sludge plus brewery and winery residues has published co-HTL evidence for synergistic product yield and energy-content effects.

Max blend
30%
H/C proxy
3
N dilution
82
Risk
24
Industrial lipid residue55.2

Food-processing grease residue palmitic acid

Food-processing lipid residues are a higher-quality branch than mixed food waste when supply is available and contamination is controlled.

Max blend
18%
H/C proxy
2
N dilution
92
Risk
34
Plastic carbon co-feed50.4

Clean PE/PP polyolefin film dodecane

Synthetic polymer HTL work shows polyolefins can shift product carbon toward hydrocarbon-like oils, but mixed plastic sorting is the gate.

Max blend
10%
H/C proxy
2.17
N dilution
96
Risk
68
Oxygenated liquid co-feed40.7

Crude glycerol glycerol

Glycerol-assisted liquefaction is an adjacent donor/solvent lead, but glycerol oxygen and crude-glycerol salts can move burden to the aqueous phase.

Max blend
15%
H/C proxy
2.67
N dilution
84
Risk
40
Municipal organic digestate37.8

OFMSW digestate acetic acid

Municipal organic digestate is infrastructure-aligned with wastewater sites and can be routed through HTL or sequential digestion/HTL branches.

Max blend
35%
H/C proxy
2
N dilution
50
Risk
44
Cellulosic wet solid36

Green / lignocellulosic waste cellulose monomer proxy

Green waste can dilute nitrogen but often brings oxygen-rich solids that reduce oil quality unless severity or co-solvent strategy is tuned.

Max blend
25%
H/C proxy
2
N dilution
88
Risk
26
Protein-lipid wet biomass35.1

Microalgae / chlorella slurry alanine

Pilot and experimental co-liquefaction work with algae and sewage sludge demonstrates wet-biomass compatibility but does not solve nitrogen by itself.

Max blend
25%
H/C proxy
2.33
N dilution
24
Risk
26
Oxygenated plastic risk feed31

PET / polyester fibers dimethyl terephthalate

PET-like oxygenated plastics can add aromatic/carboxyl chemistry and should be treated as a contaminant boundary rather than a preferred co-feed.

Max blend
6%
H/C proxy
1
N dilution
90
Risk
84
Agricultural wet waste26.2

Swine manure solids urea

Wet-waste TEA/LCA models manure beside sewage sludge and food waste, making it useful as a regional branch even when fuel quality is harder.

Max blend
30%
H/C proxy
4
N dilution
16
Risk
52
Nitrogen plastic risk feed23.5

Polyamide / PUR textile fraction caprolactam

Polyamide and polyurethane can raise oil yield in polymer co-HTL screens but push nitrogen-containing molecules into the oil.

Max blend
5%
H/C proxy
1.83
N dilution
8
Risk
78
cofeed-food-sludge-2026

Effect of severity and mixing ratio of sewage sludge and food waste on biocrude yield via hydrothermal co-liquefaction

2026 sludge plus food-waste co-HTL work directly frames severity and mixing ratio as yield and product-quality variables.

Open source
cofeed-rsc-wet-waste-2026

Wet-waste HTL TEA/LCA with sewage sludge, manure, food waste, and upgrading strategy comparisons

2026 TEA/LCA context for comparing sludge, food waste, and manure feedstocks across marine, diesel, and SAF upgrading strategies.

Open source
cofeed-beverage-sludge-2022

Co-hydrothermal liquefaction of sewage sludge and beverage waste for high-quality bio-energy production

Brewery and winery residues co-liquefied with primary and return activated sludge to evaluate synergistic product effects.

Open source
cofeed-algae-residues-2021

Hydrothermal co-liquefaction of chlorella with food processing residues, green waste, and sewage sludge

Bench co-liquefaction data for algae mixtures with sewage sludge and other biogenic wastes.

Open source
cofeed-ofmsw-digestate-2025

HTL of digestate from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste

2025 digestate HTL optimization context for municipal organic waste branches near wastewater infrastructure.

Open source
cofeed-solid-fecal-2025

Integrated anaerobic co-digestion and HTL of organic solid waste and fecal sludge

Sequential organic-solid-waste/fecal-sludge integration lead for energy recovery and product slate thinking.

Open source
cofeed-polymer-screen-2021

Screening common synthetic polymers for depolymerization by subcritical HTL

Polymer HTL screen that supports treating plastics as high-carbon watch items with sorting and additive risks.

Open source
cofeed-polymer-miscanthus-2021

Co-HTL of synthetic polymers and Miscanthus: synergistic and antagonistic effects

Polymer co-HTL work showing some polymers boost oil yield while PET and nitrogen plastics can worsen oil chemistry.

Open source
cofeed-food-saf-2025

Food waste to SAF through pretreated HTL biocrude and CoMo catalysis

Food-waste HTL upgrading context for why lipid/food-waste co-feeds can be valuable but still need severe product qualification.

Open source
cofeed-sludge-review-2025

Municipal sludge HTL review: biocrude production and fuel-quality upgrading

Recent review emphasizing sludge moisture, oxygen, nitrogen, byproduct utilization, catalyst innovation, and blended process integration.

Open source