RDKit-parsed partition marker molecules
Docker-Generated Product Recovery Screen
Product Separation Lab
A 3D recovery lab for oil, aqueous phase, char, gas, solvent bias, emulsion risk, contaminant partitioning, and mass-balance closure.
recovery operations scored
top individual recovery operation
modeled aqueous-to-oil mass ratio after HTL
Oil/water interface branch. Targets fatty acids, amides, phenolics, salts, and fine solids that can hide oil in stable emulsions.
pH, salt, and demulsifier jar test Bench/pilot support
Cheap bench tests can identify whether fatty acids, salts, pH, fine solids, or polar nitrogen species are locking emulsions.
Dose response, oil quality impact, aqueous COD shift, metals/PFAS movement, and scale-up transfer to centrifuge/coalescer settings.Coalescer / electrostatic emulsion treater Design option
Fatty acids, amides, phenolics, ash, and fine char can stabilize emulsions that inflate or hide oil yield.
Droplet-size distribution, salt/pH sensitivity, residence, temperature, recovered-water quality, and oil dryness.Two-stage centrifugation Pilot/process design
Centrifugation is the practical bridge between oil yield and an oil product that can feed upgrading.
G-force, temperature, residence, water in oil, oil in water, solids carryover, and bowl fouling.Char filtration and oil-on-solids wash Bench/pilot required
Unrecovered oil on hydrochar can make a bad separator look like a low-yield reactor and can misstate residual hazards.
Oil-on-char, solids moisture, PFAS/metals/phosphorus partitioning, wash method, and residual leachability.Green solvent extraction benchmark Bench benchmark
Solvent extraction reveals recoverable organics and solvent-selective chemistry, but it should benchmark rather than define continuous product yield.
Solvent choice, recovery, residual solvent, extracted nitrogen, oil quality bias, and whether solvent-assisted yield can be matched physically.Inline mass-balance sampling manifold Pilot-critical
A separator cannot be optimized unless every stream is sampled with consistent temperature, pressure, and phase handling.
Sampling point design, hot/cold protocols, replicate closure, solids capture, gas/condensate accounting, and custody blanks.The Docker selection model picks Two-stage centrifugation + Inline mass-balance sampling manifold + Hydrocyclone plus gravity separator + Hot three-phase separator + Coalescer / electrostatic emulsion treater + Aqueous organics and PFAS split assay as the first recovery package. Pyomo-formulated six-operation recovery package with oil, char, emulsion, aqueous, data, solvent-minimization, contaminant, safety, and capex gates; solved by deterministic enumeration.
Current recovery decision
Treat reported oil yield as unproven until the phase split closes
The generated screen ranks two-stage centrifugation first and selects a solvent-minimized recovery package. Solvent extraction stays useful as a benchmark, but the first pilot recovery train should prove physical oil recovery, emulsion control, aqueous contaminant closure, and oil-on-char losses before product claims are promoted.
25% dry-sludge oil-yield screen before recovery loss.
The water-side stream dominates separator hydraulics and contaminant closure.
Solids and gas must be metered to keep oil yield from becoming a loose estimate.
Emulsion control branch
Targets fatty acids, amides, phenolics, salts, and fine solids that can hide oil in stable emulsions.
- Oil recovery
- 68.7
- Emulsion
- 69.3
- Solvent
- 81
- Contaminants
- 72.7
Solvent-minimized pilot
Prioritizes physical recovery, emulsion control, gas closure, solids rejection, and aqueous contaminant accounting before routine solvents.
- Oil recovery
- 57.2
- Emulsion
- 51.8
- Solvent
- 92.2
- Contaminants
- 71.2
Upgrading feed protection
Focuses on solids, salts, metals, water, and contaminant carryover before hydrotreating.
- Oil recovery
- 49.3
- Emulsion
- 43.7
- Solvent
- 92
- Contaminants
- 77
Solvent benchmark
Uses solvent extraction to reveal recoverable organics and chemical bias while keeping solvent recovery and safety visible.
- Oil recovery
- 57.3
- Emulsion
- 50
- Solvent
- 71.7
- Contaminants
- 83
Generated recovery package
Pyomo-gated six-operation separator package
Two-stage centrifugation
G-force, temperature, residence, water in oil, oil in water, solids carryover, and bowl fouling.
Inline mass-balance sampling manifold
Sampling point design, hot/cold protocols, replicate closure, solids capture, gas/condensate accounting, and custody blanks.
Hydrocyclone plus gravity separator
Oil loss to solids, organics on hydrochar, underflow oil content, split repeatability, and residence sensitivity.
Hot three-phase separator
Residence time, pressure control, interface level, solids dropout, hot oil recovery, and gas disengagement.
Coalescer / electrostatic emulsion treater
Droplet-size distribution, salt/pH sensitivity, residence, temperature, recovered-water quality, and oil dryness.
Aqueous organics and PFAS split assay
COD/TOC, ammonia, phenolics, pyridines, PFAS targets/suspects, oil droplets, and biological-treatment compatibility.
Partition markers
Which molecules can distort oil, water, char, and emulsion accounting
Phenol C6H6O
- Oil
- 63.4
- Aqueous
- 57.2
- Char
- 39.6
- Emulsion
- 78
Caprolactam C6H11NO
- Oil
- 45.7
- Aqueous
- 68.8
- Char
- 20.7
- Emulsion
- 78
PFOA C7HF13O2
- Oil
- 95.9
- Aqueous
- 37.8
- Char
- 45.2
- Emulsion
- 78
Indole C8H7N
- Oil
- 81.2
- Aqueous
- 38.8
- Char
- 58.7
- Emulsion
- 74
Palmitic acid C16H32O2
- Oil
- 100
- Aqueous
- 18.6
- Char
- 52.2
- Emulsion
- 54
Oleic acid C18H34O2
- Oil
- 100
- Aqueous
- 12.5
- Char
- 54.4
- Emulsion
- 54
Acetic acid C2H4O2
- Oil
- 35.8
- Aqueous
- 78.7
- Char
- 18.4
- Emulsion
- 54
Ammonia H3N
- Oil
- 37.3
- Aqueous
- 76.9
- Char
- 18.6
- Emulsion
- 54
Pyridine C5H5N
- Oil
- 60.6
- Aqueous
- 49.5
- Char
- 38.3
- Emulsion
- 52
Toluene C7H8
- Oil
- 75.9
- Aqueous
- 26.1
- Char
- 42
- Emulsion
- 48
Phosphoric acid H3O4P
- Oil
- 13.4
- Aqueous
- 100
- Char
- 18
- Emulsion
- 40
Dodecane C12H26
- Oil
- 100
- Aqueous
- 0
- Char
- 49.7
- Emulsion
- 24
Operation ledger
Recovery operations must close yield, solvent, and contaminant ledgers together
Two-stage centrifugation
Centrifugation is the practical bridge between oil yield and an oil product that can feed upgrading.
- Oil
- 84
- Char
- 82
- Emulsion
- 66
- Solvent
- 94
Inline mass-balance sampling manifold
A separator cannot be optimized unless every stream is sampled with consistent temperature, pressure, and phase handling.
- Oil
- 30
- Char
- 58
- Emulsion
- 54
- Solvent
- 100
Hydrocyclone plus gravity separator
Continuous sludge HTL precedent uses physical separation to avoid routine DCM-style batch extraction.
- Oil
- 78
- Char
- 78
- Emulsion
- 54
- Solvent
- 96
Hot three-phase separator
A hot separator gives the first defensible oil, water, solid, and gas split before quench artifacts dominate.
- Oil
- 80
- Char
- 56
- Emulsion
- 58
- Solvent
- 92
Char filtration and oil-on-solids wash
Unrecovered oil on hydrochar can make a bad separator look like a low-yield reactor and can misstate residual hazards.
- Oil
- 68
- Char
- 92
- Emulsion
- 42
- Solvent
- 76
Coalescer / electrostatic emulsion treater
Fatty acids, amides, phenolics, ash, and fine char can stabilize emulsions that inflate or hide oil yield.
- Oil
- 76
- Char
- 44
- Emulsion
- 90
- Solvent
- 88
Oil polishing filter and guard bed
Fine char, ash, metals, and salts can poison hydrotreating catalysts and distort oil property measurements.
- Oil
- 72
- Char
- 86
- Emulsion
- 50
- Solvent
- 90
pH, salt, and demulsifier jar test
Cheap bench tests can identify whether fatty acids, salts, pH, fine solids, or polar nitrogen species are locking emulsions.
- Oil
- 66
- Char
- 34
- Emulsion
- 88
- Solvent
- 86
Green solvent extraction benchmark
Solvent extraction reveals recoverable organics and solvent-selective chemistry, but it should benchmark rather than define continuous product yield.
- Oil
- 88
- Char
- 64
- Emulsion
- 76
- Solvent
- 42
Aqueous organics and PFAS split assay
Recovered oil is not the only product; HTL-aq carries COD, ammonia, polar organics, PFAS, and treatment inhibition risk.
- Oil
- 24
- Char
- 28
- Emulsion
- 30
- Solvent
- 92
Gas knockout and metering
Gas mass and composition are required for energy balance, safety, carbon accounting, and pressure letdown design.
- Oil
- 18
- Char
- 24
- Emulsion
- 20
- Solvent
- 100
Solvent recovery still
Any solvent-assisted recovery must close solvent losses, safety, oil contamination, and waste streams.
- Oil
- 62
- Char
- 28
- Emulsion
- 48
- Solvent
- 30
Continuous pilot-scale sewage-sludge HTL energy and micropollutant fate
Continuous-flow pilot context for product streams, energy accounting, and micropollutant fate.
Open sourceHydrotreatment of solvent-extracted municipal sewage-sludge biocrude
Solvent choice strongly changed recovered biocrude yield, nitrogen recovery, hydrotreating behavior, catalyst deactivation, and product quality.
Open sourceSelective extraction and hydrotreatment of biocrude from sewage sludge
2025 solvent-extraction and hydrotreatment study showing solvent-dependent yields, fatty-acid profiles, nitrogen retention, and upgraded oil quality.
Open sourceEnhanced multi-step solvent extraction for fractionated HTL bio-oil
2026 extraction-method lead showing sequential solvent extraction can raise separation efficiency, useful as an analytical benchmark rather than sludge-scale proof.
Open sourceSeparation of HTL biocrude from faecal sludge without solvent
Solventless fecal-sludge separation precedent supporting solvent-minimized recovery experiments for sanitation-derived feedstocks.
Open sourceSewage-sludge HTL TEA with separator and centrifugation train
Process design source describing separator outputs, oil-sand emulsion handling, startup solvent use, and two-stage centrifugation.
Open sourceSludge-to-energy HTL and waste-stream management
Waste-stream source for aqueous volume, hydrochar phosphorus, heavy metals, and product distribution management.
Open sourceHydrothermal liquefaction of sewage sludge comprehensive review
Recent review covering extraction methods, solvents, biocrude yield, aqueous phase, hydrochar, and byproduct valorization.
Open sourceMunicipal sludge HTL biocrude production and fuel-quality upgrading
2026 municipal-sludge HTL review emphasizing fuel-quality upgrading, byproduct use, and integration gaps.
Open sourceContinuous activated-sludge treatment of sewage-sludge HTL process water
HTL aqueous treatment source for return-load, nitrification, and pollutant removal considerations.
Open sourceEffects of the HTL aqueous phase on activated sludge
WRRF compatibility source for process-water treatment and biological response.
Open sourceMunicipal biosolids PFAS treatment literature review
PFAS literature review supporting contaminant partition checks across oil, aqueous, char, and residual streams.
Open sourceAnalytical release methods for sewage-derived oil and residuals
Analytical context for paired stream sampling, oil quality, residuals, and fuel-readiness evidence.
Open sourceFast and isothermal sludge HTL products, pathways, and kinetics
Severity and product-yield source for oil, aqueous, solid, gas, and nitrogen distribution.
Open sourceoil yield is not a product claim until oil, aqueous, char, gas, solvent, emulsion, contaminants, and mass closure are measured