Docker-Generated Carbon Intensity Screen

Carbon Intensity Lab

A 3D climate-accounting lab for hydrogen CI, site electricity, heat recovery, WRRF methane/N2O baseline, aqueous treatment, residual credits, and model boundaries.

12

RDKit-parsed climate and inventory marker molecules

13

carbon-intensity controls scored

Hydrogen carbon-intensity certificate

top individual CI control

19 g CO2e/MJ

external municipal-sludge HTL LCA benchmark carried into the screen

Interactive CI Twin

Hydrogen, power, heat, WRRF baseline, aqueous load, and model-boundary gates

Scenario score63.9
Reported benchmark19 g/MJ
Fuel energy10750 MJ/t
Uncertainty cut91

First defensible carbon claim. Requires the high-sensitivity inputs before quoting a g CO2e/MJ number to managers or investors.

Hydrogen boundary

Hydrogen carbon-intensity certificate Required fuel-claim input

Hydrotreating hydrogen can decide whether the upgraded fuel looks low-carbon or only shifts emissions upstream.

Hydrogen source, kg H2 per kg oil, electricity or methane input, certification boundary, temporal matching, and allocation method.
Power boundary

Site electricity metering and grid factor Required metering

Pumping, heat recovery, separations, aqueous treatment, and hydrotreating auxiliaries all need measured kWh, not generic factors.

Interval meters, grid mix, renewable contract treatment, parasitic loads, and allocation across HTL, upgrading, and treatment.
Thermal integration

HTL heat recovery and thermal fuel ledger Pilot-critical

Continuous HTL climate performance depends on how much reactor heat is recovered and whether supplemental heat is renewable or fossil.

Heat exchanger duty, fouling drift, offgas combustion, thermal fluid losses, startup fuel, and steady-state recovery fraction.
Avoided baseline

WRRF methane and N2O baseline measurement Required site baseline

Avoided sludge-management credits can dominate results, but methane and N2O baselines are site-specific and high uncertainty.

Baseline sludge route, digester/landfill/land-application emissions, N2O factor, methane slip, flare uptime, and counterfactual.
Aqueous boundary

HTL aqueous treatment COD and return-load ledger Required integration gate

The aqueous phase can supply hydrogen/carbon recovery or create aeration, COD, ammonia, and inhibition penalties.

COD, TN, ammonia, toxicity, aeration demand, electrocatalytic H2 balance, return-load N2O risk, and residual treatment.
Model verification

GREET, SimaPro, and ecoinvent reconciliation Executive claim check

A low CI claim should not depend on one model configuration; the result must reconcile GREET-style and SimaPro/ecoinvent boundaries.

Functional unit, allocation, displacement, waste baseline, regional grid, H2 pathway, product slate, and uncertainty bands.

The Docker selection model picks Hydrogen carbon-intensity certificate + Site electricity metering and grid factor + HTL heat recovery and thermal fuel ledger + HTL aqueous treatment COD and return-load ledger + WRRF methane and N2O baseline measurement + GREET, SimaPro, and ecoinvent reconciliation as the first CI package. Pyomo-formulated six-control carbon-intensity package with hydrogen, power/heat, baseline, aqueous, model-verification, measurability, uncertainty, capex, and credit-risk gates; solved by deterministic enumeration.

Cantera equilibrium for methane-air combustion is included only as a thermochemistry check; the CI claim still depends on site-specific inventory and measured process data.

Current climate decision

Do not quote a low-carbon fuel result until the same-site CI ledger closes

The generated screen ranks hydrogen carbon intensity first and selects a six-control claim package: hydrogen certification, site electricity, heat recovery, aqueous treatment, WRRF methane/N2O baseline, and GREET/SimaPro reconciliation. Published 2026 results show strong upside, but the local claim still depends on measured site boundaries.

Reported benchmark19 g CO2e/MJ

Recomputed against a 95 g CO2e/MJ fossil benchmark: 80% savings.

Internal claim gate50 g CO2e/MJ

Requires at least 47.4% modeled savings before a manager-facing low-CI claim is promoted.

Fuel energy case10750 MJ/t

Based on 250 kg biocrude per tonne dry sludge and 43 MJ/kg finished-fuel LHV.

First defensible carbon claim

Minimum CI claim gate

63.9

Requires the high-sensitivity inputs before quoting a g CO2e/MJ number to managers or investors.

CI potential
81.7
Uncertainty
91
Measured
86
Credit risk
47.3
Hydrotreating emissions focus

Low-carbon hydrogen branch

61.8

Tests whether HTL aqueous carbon, electrolysis, or certified low-carbon H2 can support deeper upgrading without losing the CI case.

CI potential
76
Uncertainty
88.7
Measured
86.3
Credit risk
47.7
Marine/diesel/SAF comparison

Refinery product-slate branch

60.1

Separates marine fuel, renewable diesel, and SAF because deeper upgrading can increase hydrogen demand and lower liquid yield.

CI potential
75.3
Uncertainty
84
Measured
86.7
Credit risk
43
Optional negative-emissions case

Carbon removal stretch branch

57.2

Explores biogenic CO2 capture only after the base-case CI is measured, because capture energy and credit rules can dominate the result.

CI potential
76
Uncertainty
83.3
Measured
84
Credit risk
55.7
Avoided-burden focus

WRRF displacement credit branch

54.4

Checks whether avoided sludge management and nutrient credits are real enough to carry the LCA instead of becoming fragile assumptions.

CI potential
60.3
Uncertainty
79.3
Measured
83.3
Credit risk
57.7

Generated CI package

Pyomo-gated six-control carbon-intensity package

68.7

Hydrogen carbon-intensity certificate

Hydrogen source, kg H2 per kg oil, electricity or methane input, certification boundary, temporal matching, and allocation method.

66.4

Site electricity metering and grid factor

Interval meters, grid mix, renewable contract treatment, parasitic loads, and allocation across HTL, upgrading, and treatment.

63.3

HTL heat recovery and thermal fuel ledger

Heat exchanger duty, fouling drift, offgas combustion, thermal fluid losses, startup fuel, and steady-state recovery fraction.

62.3

HTL aqueous treatment COD and return-load ledger

COD, TN, ammonia, toxicity, aeration demand, electrocatalytic H2 balance, return-load N2O risk, and residual treatment.

61.9

WRRF methane and N2O baseline measurement

Baseline sludge route, digester/landfill/land-application emissions, N2O factor, methane slip, flare uptime, and counterfactual.

60.8

GREET, SimaPro, and ecoinvent reconciliation

Functional unit, allocation, displacement, waste baseline, regional grid, H2 pathway, product slate, and uncertainty bands.

Climate markers

Which molecules and inventory species move the carbon-intensity result

finished fuel hydrocarbon proxy

Dodecane C12H26

Attention
100
GWP100
0
C atoms
12
N atoms
0
WRRF and land-application N2O

Nitrous oxide N2O

Attention
89.1
GWP100
273
C atoms
0
N atoms
2
recalcitrant aqueous COD marker

Phenol C6H6O

Attention
57
GWP100
0
C atoms
6
N atoms
0
aqueous COD marker

Acetic acid C2H4O2

Attention
24
GWP100
0
C atoms
2
N atoms
0
biogenic or fossil CO2

Carbon dioxide CO2

Attention
15.2
GWP100
1
C atoms
1
N atoms
0
methane slip / avoided sludge baseline

Methane CH4

Attention
15
GWP100
27.2
C atoms
1
N atoms
0
nitrogen return-load precursor

Ammonia H3N

Attention
13
GWP100
0
C atoms
0
N atoms
1
fertilizer displacement proxy

Phosphoric acid H3O4P

Attention
12
GWP100
0
C atoms
0
N atoms
0
offgas and treatment marker

Hydrogen sulfide H2S

Attention
8
GWP100
0
C atoms
0
N atoms
0
electrolysis / wet-oxidation co-product

Oxygen O2

Attention
6
GWP100
0
C atoms
0
N atoms
0
process water and heat load

Water H2O

Attention
3
GWP100
0
C atoms
0
N atoms
0
upgrading reagent

Hydrogen H2

Attention
0
GWP100
0
C atoms
0
N atoms
0

Control ledger

Every low-carbon claim needs measured site data, model boundaries, and uncertainty bands

Hydrogen boundary68.7

Hydrogen carbon-intensity certificate

Hydrotreating hydrogen can decide whether the upgraded fuel looks low-carbon or only shifts emissions upstream.

CI
94
Measured
90
Uncertainty
92
Credit risk
36
Power boundary66.4

Site electricity metering and grid factor

Pumping, heat recovery, separations, aqueous treatment, and hydrotreating auxiliaries all need measured kWh, not generic factors.

CI
76
Measured
96
Uncertainty
90
Credit risk
32
Thermal integration63.3

HTL heat recovery and thermal fuel ledger

Continuous HTL climate performance depends on how much reactor heat is recovered and whether supplemental heat is renewable or fossil.

CI
88
Measured
88
Uncertainty
86
Credit risk
28
Aqueous boundary62.3

HTL aqueous treatment COD and return-load ledger

The aqueous phase can supply hydrogen/carbon recovery or create aeration, COD, ammonia, and inhibition penalties.

CI
82
Measured
82
Uncertainty
88
Credit risk
42
Avoided baseline61.9

WRRF methane and N2O baseline measurement

Avoided sludge-management credits can dominate results, but methane and N2O baselines are site-specific and high uncertainty.

CI
92
Measured
74
Uncertainty
94
Credit risk
76
Model verification60.8

GREET, SimaPro, and ecoinvent reconciliation

A low CI claim should not depend on one model configuration; the result must reconcile GREET-style and SimaPro/ecoinvent boundaries.

CI
58
Measured
86
Uncertainty
96
Credit risk
70
Carbon accounting58.7

Biogenic and fossil carbon split

Biogenic CO2 assumptions need a defensible boundary, especially if fossil-derived contaminants, plastics, or external hydrogen enter.

CI
70
Measured
84
Uncertainty
88
Credit risk
64
Fuel slate57

Marine, renewable diesel, and SAF product-slate boundary

Marine fuel, renewable diesel, and SAF carry different hydrogen, fractionation, hydrocracking, HDN, and yield penalties.

CI
72
Measured
84
Uncertainty
84
Credit risk
54
Air emissions55.8

Offgas combustion and methane-slip control

Small methane slip or unmetered offgas can erase climate gains because methane has high short- and long-term warming impact.

CI
74
Measured
80
Uncertainty
82
Credit risk
52
Logistics50.4

Sludge, biocrude, hydrogen, and product logistics boundary

Centralized upgrading can be attractive, but hauling wet sludge, biocrude, hydrogen, or product changes both cost and CI.

CI
46
Measured
92
Uncertainty
66
Credit risk
34
Co-product credit47.5

Residual phosphorus and fertilizer displacement protocol

Phosphorus recovery can improve the climate and circularity case, but credits must survive contaminant and market constraints.

CI
62
Measured
76
Uncertainty
70
Credit risk
72
Water boundary47.4

Water consumption and effluent-quality ledger

Water use is not the same as CI, but water treatment energy, effluent quality, and return loads affect the overall environmental claim.

CI
34
Measured
88
Uncertainty
62
Credit risk
30
Carbon removal branch38.1

Biogenic CO2 capture branch

Capturing biogenic CO2 could create negative-emissions upside, but it should not be used to rescue an unproven base case.

CI
90
Measured
70
Uncertainty
58
Credit risk
88
ci-rsc-wet-waste-2026

Wet-waste HTL TEA/LCA with upgrading strategies

2026 wet-waste HTL source comparing sludge, manure, and food waste across marine, renewable diesel, and SAF upgrading with GREET-style fuel assumptions and biogenic CO2 handling.

Open source
ci-energy-mss-2026

Municipal sewage sludge HTL TEA/LCA

2026 Energy paper reporting continuous-mode municipal sewage-sludge HTL with upgraded biofuel carbon footprint of 19 g CO2e/MJ and 80% GHG savings versus fossil fuels.

Open source
ci-uncertainty-pnnl-2023

Uncertainty analysis for wet-waste HTL TEA/LCA

PNNL uncertainty source for wet-waste HTL supply-chain economics and environmental measures.

Open source
ci-pnnl-sot-2022

Wet Waste HTL and Biocrude Upgrading to Hydrocarbon Fuels: 2022 SOT

PNNL SOT report with conversion life-cycle inventory, energy/carbon efficiency, hydrogen upgrading, and wet-waste process data.

Open source
ci-pnnl-electrooxidation-2025

Electrocatalytic oxidation of HTL aqueous phase for treatment and H2

PNNL source indicating HTL aqueous COD can potentially produce H2 for hydrotreating while treating the aqueous phase.

Open source
ci-rsc-wwtp-2024

HTL integrated with wastewater treatment plants

RSC source comparing co-located WWTP HTL scenarios, process configurations, TEA, and LCA choices.

Open source
ci-energy-fuels-tea-2023

Liquid biofuels from sewage sludge via HTL TEA

Sewage-sludge HTL TEA source with heat demand, gas co-combustion, centralized upgrading, and process economics context.

Open source
ci-rser-review-2025

Sewage sludge HTL review of biocrude and byproducts

2025 review covering byproduct phases, phosphorus/metals partitioning, and circular resource-recovery context.

Open source
ci-nrel-lci-2023

Comparing life-cycle emissions of biofuel pathways

Life-cycle inventory source for comparing biofuel pathways, aqueous waste treatment boundaries, and sludge/manure upgraded fuel cases.

Open source

carbon intensity is not claim-ready until hydrogen, electricity, heat recovery, methane/N2O baseline, aqueous treatment, residual credits, and model boundaries are measured for the same site