Pilot Design

From bench signal to wastewater-site trial

The pilot plan treats sewage-to-fuel as a whole-facility integration problem. It must prove conversion, sidestream compatibility, product quality, and economics under the same evidence standard.

01

Feedstock acceptance

Can the site provide stable sludge for continuous testing?

  • Dry solids
  • Volatile solids
  • Ash
  • Lipids/proteins/carbohydrates
  • Metals screen

Thirty-day variability stays inside the modeled feed envelope.

02

HTL conversion

Does the reactor produce enough biocrude at practical severity?

  • Biocrude yield
  • Gas yield
  • Char/solids
  • Energy balance
  • Heat exchanger duty

Net fuel intermediate improves over AD baseline after parasitic loads.

03

Aqueous phase integration

Can sidestreams return to the plant without destabilizing treatment?

  • COD
  • Ammonia
  • Toxicity screen
  • BMP potential
  • Nitrification response

Pretreatment plus recycle load remains inside plant permit and biology limits.

04

Upgrading and product quality

Can biocrude be upgraded into a credible fuel blendstock?

  • Hydrogen demand
  • Nitrogen
  • Oxygen
  • Sulfur
  • Distillation range
  • Stability

Hydrotreating closes the product-quality gap without erasing the energy or carbon benefit.

05

Decision economics

Does the integrated system justify scale-up capital?

  • Capex class estimate
  • Opex
  • Carbon intensity
  • Waste disposal avoided
  • Revenue stack

Sensitivity analysis shows a durable advantage under conservative sludge, energy, and hydrogen prices.

Operating Package

What the frontend simulation should expose

Mass balance

Dry solids, volatile solids, ash, biocrude, gas, char, aqueous organics, and recovered nutrients.

Energy balance

Heat recovery, pumping, drying avoided, hydrogen demand, RNG credit, and parasitic treatment load.

Risk balance

Aqueous phase inhibition, nitrogen in upgraded product, PFAS/metals uncertainty, and permit boundary.

Open Scenario Workspace

Evidence linked to pilot gates